Digital museum showcasing the collection of worldwide legends over the years! 千古不朽博物館展示多年來收藏的世界傳奇故事!
Qing Dynasty,
Qianlong Tongbao,
Unknown
(Privately Minted Version 1)
清
乾隆通寶
不明
(私鑄一版)
Item number: A622
Year: AD 1735-1796
Material: Brass
Size: 15.5 x 15.3 x 0.5 mm
Weight: 0.7 g
Provenance:
1. Noonans 2022
2. D. L. F. Sealy Collection
This is a coin known as the Qianlong Tongbao, issued during the reign of the sixth emperor of the Qing dynasty, Emperor Qianlong, who ruled from AD 1735 to 1796.
The coin features a square hole in its centre, characteristic of traditional Chinese cash coins. Significant wear is evident on the coin’s outer and inner rims, as well as around the square hole. The inscription on the obverse is largely illegible, with only the character “乾” (Qian) discernible, suggesting its identification as a Qianlong Tongbao. The reverse side is so eroded that no identifying marks or inscriptions remain visible.
Coins from the Qing dynasty generally did not feature marked denominations, relying instead on size and weight for distinction. Standard Xiaoping Qian (small coins) typically measured between 24.2 and 28.0 mm in diameter and weighed 3.8 to 4.2 g. In contrast, this particular Qianlong Tongbao coin measures only 15.5 mm in diameter and weighs a mere 0.7 g, suggesting it may have been privately minted, as private minting was widespread during the Qianlong era (AD 1735–1796).
The prevalence of privately minted coins during this period stemmed from a combination of increased demand and challenges in governance. Economic prosperity during Emperor Qianlong’s reign heightened the need for currency, while official mints struggled to meet market demands. Dependence on copper sourced from Yunnan (滇銅) led to fluctuations in material costs and logistical issues, further elevating production expenses. Remote regions such as Guizhou, plagued by economic underdevelopment and inadequate official coin supply, relied heavily on privately minted coins for daily transactions. Government efforts to curb private minting by reducing the weight of official coins were largely ineffective, inadvertently encouraging further illicit minting. Additionally, the lack of clearly marked denominations on Qing coins lowered the barrier for counterfeiting, exacerbating the problem. Thus, both policy shortcomings and economic constraints contributed to the proliferation of privately minted Qianlong Tongbao coins.