Digital museum showcasing the collection of worldwide legends over the years! 千古不朽博物館展示多年來收藏的世界傳奇故事!
US-Saudi Oil Trade Gold Disk
美國-沙烏地石油貿易金碟
Item number: A179
Year: AD 1945
Material: Gold
Size: 29.5 x 29.5 mm
Weight: 31.95 g
Manufactured by: U.S. Mint, Philadelphia
Provenance: Heritage Auctions 2024
This is a gold disk minted in AD 1945 by the United States PhiladelphiaMint, weighing four pounds, and produced for the oil trade between the United States and Saudi Arabia. A total of 91,210 pieces were minted.
On the obverse side of the disk, the central motif features the bald eagle, the official emblem of the United States. Above and below the eagle are inscriptions indicating the minting authority “U.S.MINT” and location “PHILADELPHIA-U.S.A.”. On the reverse side of the disk, there are three lines of text describing its weight and purity: “GROSS WEIGHT-493.1 GRAINS,” “NET WEIGHT(of gold) 452.008333 GR.,” and “FITNENESS 916 2/3.”
The United States’ investment in Saudi Arabia’s oil industry began in AD 1932 when California Standard Oil Company (now Chevron) explored for oil in the kingdom. In AD 1933, a subsidiary of California Standard Oil Company called ARAMCO secured a concession agreement with the Saudi royal family, paying them three million dollars annually, to explore and extract oil in Saudi Arabia. Over time, as ownership changed hands, ARAMCO evolved into the Saudi Arabian Oil Company, the largest state-owned enterprise in Saudi Arabia in AD 2024.
In the first half of the 20th century, the oil trade in the Middle East relied on the British sovereign gold coin as the settlement currency, with one sovereign equivalent to 0.2354 ounces of gold. ARAMCO faced a significant challenge when Britain stopped minting sovereigns in AD 1917. The company had to seek assistance from the U.S. Treasury to purchase sovereigns from foreign central banks to fulfill its agreements with the Saudi royal family. With the outbreak of World War II, the Saudi royal family, coordinated by the U.S. government, allowed ARAMCO to settle directly in U.S. dollars.
As the war ended in AD 1945, international gold prices had risen to $70 per ounce, compared to the $35 per unit ARAMCO had been paying. Consequently, the Saudi royal family pressured the U.S. to restore settlement in gold. Due to these circumstances, the United States Mint produced two batches of gold disks for oil trade in AD 1945 and AD 1947, based on the sovereign standard. Many of these gold disks were sent by the Saudi government to Mumbai, India, where they were melted down into gold ingots, then sold to Macau or transported back to Saudi Arabia to serve as raw material for minting Saudi currency.
It is interesting that there was a discussion about who commissioned the United States Mint to produce the gold disks. The earliest such discussion occurred in AD 1959, led by the prominent American numismatist Harry X. Boosel. He wrote letters of inquiry to various entities involved, including the United States Department of State, the Embassy of Saudi Arabia in the United States, and the United States Mint, and compiled their responses. Based on this research, Boosel concluded, as published in “The Numismatist” magazine, that ARAMCO paid for the United States Mint to produce these gold disks, intended for trade settlements in Saudi Arabia. Despite the lack of archival evidence supporting this conclusion, Boosel’s theory gained wide acceptance and was even referenced in a column about the gold disks in “The New York Times” in AD 1991.
In AD 2018, the renowned economic historian John Paul Koning, after researching the documents from Federal Reserve Economic Research Archives (FRASER), overturned Bussel’s view and determined that the commissioning party should be the Saudi government rather than ARAMCO. The primary reason for this shift lies in the fact that after the restoration of the gold standard in AD 1934, the United States government did not allow private enterprises to exchange dollars for gold and even held gold as assets in U.S. territories. The Treasury Department only permitted the sale of gold to foreign governments, central banks, and international monetary organizations. According to Bussel’s theory, ARAMCO’s purchase of gold from the government would have violated this law.
Koning’s most crucial evidence came from the testimony presented on May 13, AD 1949, by the United States Senate Committee on Banking and Currency regarding the “Statement on ARAMCO Sovereigns” case. The testimony mentioned the aforementioned restrictions on gold transactions and, more importantly, stated that the government did not sell gold to ARAMCO. However, the text also mentioned that, to assist the company in avoiding default, the U.S. government had inquired about purchasing sovereigns from the Central Bank of Argentina.